Hush hush silence pdf english12/31/2022 ![]() ![]() In this context, the ethical uses of language brought up by the civility campaign are not reflected in the campaign itself.īelow is a table outlining the frame through which we understand this issue. ![]() If the goal of the civility campaign is to provoke members of our community to speak and listen in particular ways, and about particular things, it is setting in place a series of rules for that community (Glenn 1–2).Ĭritical Discourse Analysis (CDA) helps us understand the relationships between language, culture, and inequality within a particular context (Gee 23). Who will you decide to be?īy placing the rhetorical focus on individuals, the campaign points to a compelling dynamic in the relationship between power and language. You can choose to be civil in a certain situation. Each of us is responsible for showing civility in our own actions.That’s why you’ll see a series of posters, table tents and electronic messages across our community challenging you to think about your choices. Without civility, it fails to thrive…we believe that civility comes down to treating everyone with respect. When civility is present in a community such as ours, it becomes a healthy, vibrant and rewarding place to live and work. ![]() ![]() The campus civility campaign was a top-down attempt to control individual behaviour. We will conclude this article with ideas about how librarians might go beyond performative civility to acknowledge the structural and cultural differences that exist within their communities. Instead, it has contributed additional silencing rhetoric, which could have dangerous implications for the well-being of library employees and the patrons we serve. There is no evidence that this civility discourse has improved the situations of already-marginalized populations or reduced bullying. Within the particular context of academic libraries, we examine how the rhetoric of civility has historically been used to control behaviour. The civility campaign was prompted by concerns about discrimination and bullying at a mid-sized public university in the Midwest. In this article, we use Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to compare the rhetoric of a campus-wide civility campaign with literature related to civility in libraries. We conclude with recommendations about how to raise our voices instead of silencing our peers.īy Jessica Schomberg and Kirsti Cole Introduction To combat discrimination and bullying, we need to be attentive to systemic power dynamics and to rhetoric designed to enforce compliance and conformity. We use Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to do a rhetorical analysis of a campus-wide civility campaign in contrast with literature about civility in libraries. This article critiques the idea that civility rhetoric decreases workplace bullying or discrimination. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |